Some brave, bold academic decided to stand up to a commercial pay-fee deep website that holds academic articles. The result you will read about below, but in essence, bad things happened.

This highlights a moral battle. There is a a great deal of financial gain to the gatekeepers of wonderful data behind fee-pay portals of Deep Web sites.  Controversy erupts when the data can be argued to be public domain.

 

From Aljazeera News –

On July 19, 2011, Aaron Swartz, a computer programmer and activist, was arrested for downloading 4.8 million academic articles. The articles constituted nearly the entire catalogue of JSTOR, a scholarly research database. Universities that want to use JSTOR are charged as much as $50,000 in annual subscription fees.

Individuals who want to use JSTOR must shell out an average of $19 per article. The academics who write the articles are not paid for their work, nor are the academics who review it. The only people who profit are the 211 employees of JSTOR.

Swartz thought this was wrong. The paywall, he argued, constituted “private theft of public culture”. It hurt not only the greater public, but also academics who must “pay money to read the work of their colleagues”.

For attempting to make scholarship accessible to people who cannot afford it, Swartz is facing a $1 million fine and up to 35 years in prison. The severity of the charges shocked activists fighting for open access publication. But it shocked academics too, for different reasons.

 

http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/2012/10/20121017558785551.html